Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,352,482 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.634. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 114.6 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 34.6%), householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $53,974, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $94,863, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $52,986, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $40,340, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $94,867, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 58.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 56.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.91%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.5%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 31.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 19.2%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 94.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 0.76%, a difference of 80.9%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 71.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.3%).