Immigrants from England vs Eastern European Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,496,292 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.046. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Eastern Europeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 10.5 Eastern Europeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,844 compared to $55,780, a difference of 14.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $114,523, a difference of 12.3%), and median family income ($112,038 compared to $125,546, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $54,066, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $70,470, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.44%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.0%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.82%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.94%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 54.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.9%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Eastern European communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.030%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 2.6%).