Immigrants from Cabo Verde vs Central American Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,645,703 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Central Americans within Immigrant from Cabo Verde communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cabo Verde within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Central Americans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cabo Verde corresponds to an increase of 30.5 Central Americans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Central American communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($46,654 compared to $56,321, a difference of 20.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,542 compared to $90,951, a difference of 8.9%), and median household income ($73,515 compared to $78,803, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($38,540 compared to $38,560, a difference of 0.050%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,304 compared to $85,144, a difference of 1.0%), and wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Central American communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (23.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 68.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.50%), single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and single female poverty (22.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Central American communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 40.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Central American communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 28.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Central American communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 25.9%), married-couple households (36.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 21.3%), and births to unmarried women (42.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.5%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.41, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (61.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Central American communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (3.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 86.8%), no vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 70.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (81.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 9.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (43.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 50.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Central American communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 16.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and bachelor's degree (29.2% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 3rd grade (96.2% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cabo Verde and Central American communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (26.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (52.4% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 8.9%).