Hungarian vs New Zealander No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Hungarian
New Zealander
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Hungarians
New Zealanders
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
80.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
65.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hungarian vs New Zealander No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,786,573 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hungarians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474 and weighted average of 9.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,783,580 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 2.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hungarian | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 0.88% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 62.3% | 19.1% |
| Range | 61.5% | 17.7% |
| Mean | 14.3% | 5.9% |
| Median | 8.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 8.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.4% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Hungarians and New Zealanders by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Hungarians are Immigrants from Nicaragua (9.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.9%, a difference of 0.20%), Bahamian (9.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Indonesia (10.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and Spanish American Indian (10.1%, a difference of 0.83%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |
| Colombians | 73.9 /100 | #150 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 73.8 /100 | #151 | Good 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 10.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 72.5 /100 | #153 | Good 10.1% |
| Sioux | 72.4 /100 | #154 | Good 10.1% |
| Salvadorans | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 70.9 /100 | #156 | Good 10.1% |
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% |
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |