Chinese vs Welsh Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Welsh
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chinese
Welsh
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Welsh Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,244,925 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.523 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 0.78%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Welsh |
Minimum | 0.63% | 1.9% |
Maximum | 11.0% | 60.0% |
Range | 10.4% | 58.1% |
Mean | 4.4% | 10.7% |
Median | 3.9% | 6.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 13.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 10.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Welsh by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Pima (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |