Chinese vs Welsh In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Chinese
Welsh
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Chinese
Welsh
84.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
12.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
31.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Welsh In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,747 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.071 and weighted average of 84.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 527,913,112 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.387 and weighted average of 84.5%, a difference of 0.21%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Welsh |
Minimum | 56.3% | 54.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 43.7% | 45.8% |
Mean | 83.8% | 89.0% |
Median | 85.3% | 88.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.3% | 83.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.8% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 16.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Welsh by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Jordan (84.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Armenia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Indonesia (84.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Ecuadorian (84.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Cambodia (84.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Zimbabwean (84.5%, a difference of 0.020%), English (84.5%, a difference of 0.050%), South American Indian (84.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Portuguese (84.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Israel (84.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Welsh | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 84.5% |
Zimbabweans | 28.7 /100 | #191 | Fair 84.5% |
English | 25.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 84.5% |
South American Indians | 25.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 84.5% |
Portuguese | 21.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 84.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 20.8 /100 | #195 | Fair 84.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 19.5 /100 | #196 | Poor 84.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 19.3 /100 | #197 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 19.0 /100 | #198 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.3 /100 | #199 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 17.5 /100 | #200 | Poor 84.4% |
Laotians | 16.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 84.4% |
Afghans | 15.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 15.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 84.4% |
Venezuelans | 15.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 84.4% |
Ecuadorians | 14.8 /100 | #205 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 14.3 /100 | #206 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 13.3 /100 | #207 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 13.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 84.4% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 12.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 84.4% |
Chinese | 12.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 84.3% |