Chinese vs Ottawa Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Ottawa
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chinese
Ottawa
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Ottawa Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,954,847 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.574 and weighted average of 3.8%, a difference of 4.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Ottawa |
Minimum | 0.63% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 11.0% | 14.5% |
Range | 10.4% | 13.0% |
Mean | 4.4% | 5.0% |
Median | 3.9% | 4.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Ottawa by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are French Canadian (3.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Marshallese (3.8%, a difference of 0.56%), English (3.8%, a difference of 1.4%), French (3.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and Menominee (3.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 3.7% |
French | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 3.8% |
English | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 3.8% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 3.8% |
French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 3.8% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 3.8% |