Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minnesota
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota

0.0%
80.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota

City % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1.Erhard75.3%33.4%(+41.9)#133.4%(+41.9)#40
2.Vergas73.2%33.4%(+39.8)#233.4%(+39.8)#62
3.Spring Hill72.3%33.4%(+38.9)#333.4%(+38.9)#69
4.Starbuck72.0%33.4%(+38.6)#433.4%(+38.6)#76
5.Swanville71.0%33.4%(+37.6)#533.4%(+37.6)#97
6.Northome70.5%33.4%(+37.1)#633.4%(+37.1)#107
7.Madison Lake70.1%33.4%(+36.7)#733.4%(+36.7)#117
8.Blue Earth69.1%33.4%(+35.7)#833.4%(+35.7)#141
9.Beaver Bay67.5%33.4%(+34.1)#933.4%(+34.1)#205
10.Adams66.8%33.4%(+33.4)#1033.4%(+33.4)#237
11.North St Paul66.5%33.4%(+33.1)#1133.4%(+33.1)#247
12.Henning66.3%33.4%(+32.9)#1233.4%(+32.9)#269
13.Climax65.3%33.4%(+31.9)#1333.4%(+31.9)#336
14.Porter65.0%33.4%(+31.6)#1433.4%(+31.6)#358
15.Brownsville64.5%33.4%(+31.1)#1533.4%(+31.1)#377
16.East Gull Lake64.3%33.4%(+30.9)#1633.4%(+30.9)#397
17.Stephen64.3%33.4%(+30.9)#1733.4%(+30.9)#402
18.Elmore64.2%33.4%(+30.8)#1833.4%(+30.8)#411
19.Walnut Grove64.0%33.4%(+30.6)#1933.4%(+30.6)#419
20.La Salle63.8%33.4%(+30.4)#2033.4%(+30.4)#432
21.Bird Island63.7%33.4%(+30.3)#2133.4%(+30.3)#435
22.Jasper63.5%33.4%(+30.1)#2233.4%(+30.1)#453
23.Lismore63.5%33.4%(+30.1)#2333.4%(+30.1)#460
24.Kelliher63.4%33.4%(+30.0)#2433.4%(+30.0)#471
25.Hinckley63.1%33.4%(+29.7)#2533.4%(+29.7)#498
26.Rice62.8%33.4%(+29.4)#2633.4%(+29.4)#517
27.Welcome62.8%33.4%(+29.4)#2733.4%(+29.4)#519
28.Hugo62.4%33.4%(+29.0)#2833.4%(+29.0)#555
29.Darwin62.3%33.4%(+28.9)#2933.4%(+28.9)#583
30.Maynard62.2%33.4%(+28.8)#3033.4%(+28.8)#596
31.Russell62.0%33.4%(+28.6)#3133.4%(+28.6)#613
32.Mentor61.8%33.4%(+28.4)#3233.4%(+28.4)#625
33.Westbrook61.5%33.4%(+28.1)#3333.4%(+28.1)#652
34.Comfrey61.5%33.4%(+28.1)#3433.4%(+28.1)#656
35.Kensington61.5%33.4%(+28.1)#3533.4%(+28.1)#661
36.Brewster61.3%33.4%(+27.9)#3633.4%(+27.9)#694
37.Mcgregor61.3%33.4%(+27.9)#3733.4%(+27.9)#696
38.Morgan60.5%33.4%(+27.1)#3833.4%(+27.1)#783
39.Federal Dam60.5%33.4%(+27.1)#3933.4%(+27.1)#794
40.Freeborn60.4%33.4%(+27.0)#4033.4%(+27.0)#813
41.Ham Lake60.3%33.4%(+26.9)#4133.4%(+26.9)#816
42.Dexter60.3%33.4%(+26.9)#4233.4%(+26.9)#838
43.Oakdale60.0%33.4%(+26.6)#4333.4%(+26.6)#868
44.La Prairie59.9%33.4%(+26.5)#4433.4%(+26.5)#881
45.Pelican Rapids59.6%33.4%(+26.2)#4533.4%(+26.2)#901
46.Sherburn59.5%33.4%(+26.1)#4633.4%(+26.1)#920
47.Kenyon59.4%33.4%(+26.0)#4733.4%(+26.0)#942
48.Gem Lake59.3%33.4%(+25.9)#4833.4%(+25.9)#963
49.Naytahwaush59.3%33.4%(+25.9)#4933.4%(+25.9)#964
50.Ogilvie59.3%33.4%(+25.9)#5033.4%(+25.9)#965
51.Meadowlands59.3%33.4%(+25.9)#5133.4%(+25.9)#969
52.Pipestone59.1%33.4%(+25.7)#5233.4%(+25.7)#995
53.Cottonwood58.6%33.4%(+25.2)#5333.4%(+25.2)#1,059
54.Frost58.5%33.4%(+25.1)#5433.4%(+25.1)#1,090
55.Wahkon58.5%33.4%(+25.1)#5533.4%(+25.1)#1,091
56.Isle58.3%33.4%(+24.9)#5633.4%(+24.9)#1,127
57.Fairfax58.2%33.4%(+24.8)#5733.4%(+24.8)#1,142
58.East Grand Forks58.1%33.4%(+24.7)#5833.4%(+24.7)#1,146
59.Warroad58.0%33.4%(+24.6)#5933.4%(+24.6)#1,163
60.Belview58.0%33.4%(+24.6)#6033.4%(+24.6)#1,166
61.Parkers Prairie57.7%33.4%(+24.3)#6133.4%(+24.3)#1,198
62.Watertown57.6%33.4%(+24.2)#6233.4%(+24.2)#1,204
63.Granite Falls57.6%33.4%(+24.2)#6333.4%(+24.2)#1,210
64.Mapleton57.6%33.4%(+24.2)#6433.4%(+24.2)#1,212
65.Racine57.5%33.4%(+24.1)#6533.4%(+24.1)#1,237
66.Littlefork57.4%33.4%(+24.0)#6633.4%(+24.0)#1,254
67.Eagle Bend57.3%33.4%(+23.9)#6733.4%(+23.9)#1,274
68.Nerstrand57.3%33.4%(+23.9)#6833.4%(+23.9)#1,276
69.Hayfield57.2%33.4%(+23.8)#6933.4%(+23.8)#1,294
70.Shakopee57.1%33.4%(+23.7)#7033.4%(+23.7)#1,303
71.Hills56.9%33.4%(+23.5)#7133.4%(+23.5)#1,334
72.Mountain Lake56.8%33.4%(+23.4)#7233.4%(+23.4)#1,338
73.Wrenshall56.8%33.4%(+23.4)#7333.4%(+23.4)#1,343
74.Breckenridge56.7%33.4%(+23.3)#7433.4%(+23.3)#1,351
75.Lake Lillian56.7%33.4%(+23.3)#7533.4%(+23.3)#1,360
76.Ellsworth56.5%33.4%(+23.1)#7633.4%(+23.1)#1,408
77.Hanska56.5%33.4%(+23.1)#7733.4%(+23.1)#1,412
78.Rushmore56.5%33.4%(+23.1)#7833.4%(+23.1)#1,413
79.Waite Park56.4%33.4%(+23.0)#7933.4%(+23.0)#1,422
80.Wabasso56.4%33.4%(+23.0)#8033.4%(+23.0)#1,437
81.Rice Lake56.2%33.4%(+22.8)#8133.4%(+22.8)#1,471
82.Cosmos56.1%33.4%(+22.7)#8233.4%(+22.7)#1,488
83.Belgrade55.8%33.4%(+22.4)#8333.4%(+22.4)#1,518
84.Chisholm55.7%33.4%(+22.3)#8433.4%(+22.3)#1,529
85.Good Thunder55.6%33.4%(+22.2)#8533.4%(+22.2)#1,547
86.Bowlus55.5%33.4%(+22.1)#8633.4%(+22.1)#1,581
87.Borup55.5%33.4%(+22.1)#8733.4%(+22.1)#1,586
88.Stewartville55.3%33.4%(+21.9)#8833.4%(+21.9)#1,615
89.Milaca55.3%33.4%(+21.9)#8933.4%(+21.9)#1,619
90.New London55.2%33.4%(+21.8)#9033.4%(+21.8)#1,650
91.Braham55.0%33.4%(+21.6)#9133.4%(+21.6)#1,684
92.Urbank55.0%33.4%(+21.6)#9233.4%(+21.6)#1,688
93.Gilman54.9%33.4%(+21.5)#9333.4%(+21.5)#1,698
94.Chanhassen54.5%33.4%(+21.1)#9433.4%(+21.1)#1,736
95.Willmar54.2%33.4%(+20.8)#9533.4%(+20.8)#1,806
96.Atwater54.1%33.4%(+20.7)#9633.4%(+20.7)#1,840
97.Pierz53.8%33.4%(+20.4)#9733.4%(+20.4)#1,871
98.Wykoff53.8%33.4%(+20.4)#9833.4%(+20.4)#1,877
99.Ortonville53.7%33.4%(+20.3)#9933.4%(+20.3)#1,889
100.Chandler53.5%33.4%(+20.1)#10033.4%(+20.1)#1,940

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota are:
#1
75.3%
#2
73.2%
#3
72.3%
#4
72.0%
#5
71.0%
#6
70.5%
#7
70.1%
#8
69.1%
#9
67.5%
#10
66.8%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota?
Erhard has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota with 75.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the State of Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota is 33.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.