Canadian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 391,830,461 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.662% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 662.4 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($87,769 compared to $103,145, a difference of 17.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $113,701, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $121,444, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.48%), householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $54,800, a difference of 4.7%), and median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $44,911, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.1%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.1%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.40%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.4%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.4% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 31.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.0%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.98%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.7%).