Blackfeet vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Blackfeet
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Blackfeet

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
1,951
SOCIAL INDEX
17.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
279th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Blackfeet Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,131,636 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to a decrease of 4.1 Burmese.
Blackfeet Integration in Burmese Communities

Blackfeet vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,509 compared to $103,145, a difference of 40.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $121,444, a difference of 40.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $113,701, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $54,800, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $44,911, a difference of 25.2%).
Blackfeet vs Burmese Income
Income MetricBlackfeetBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,695
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,717
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$73,509
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,822
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,402
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,864
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,603
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,531
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,595
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,029
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.2%
Tragic
28.0%

Blackfeet vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 65.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 65.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.4%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 19.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 24.9%).
Blackfeet vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricBlackfeetBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.8%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
8.6%

Blackfeet vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.7%).
Blackfeet vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBlackfeetBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Blackfeet vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Blackfeet vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBlackfeetBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Blackfeet vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 43.8%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.87%), family households (63.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Blackfeet vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBlackfeetBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.2%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
26.4%

Blackfeet vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.17%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
Blackfeet vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBlackfeetBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.6%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.6%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.8%

Blackfeet vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 76.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 75.2%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 63.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.010%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.020%).
Blackfeet vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricBlackfeetBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Average
93.7%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Poor
92.0%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.5%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Blackfeet vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 52.6%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 46.6%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.4%).
Blackfeet vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricBlackfeetBurmese
Disability
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%