Japanese vs Burmese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Japanese
Burmese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Japanese
Burmese
2,662
SOCIAL INDEX
24.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
248th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Burmese Integration in Japanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,158,372 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 36.0 Burmese.
Japanese vs Burmese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $52,005, a difference of 30.4%), median family income ($97,288 compared to $123,369, a difference of 26.8%), and median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $65,236, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $54,800, a difference of 4.6%), median female earnings ($38,528 compared to $44,911, a difference of 16.6%), and wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 17.8%).
Income Metric | Japanese | Burmese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,870 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $97,288 | Exceptional $123,369 |
Median Household Income | Fair $83,395 | Exceptional $103,145 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,825 | Exceptional $54,559 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,473 | Exceptional $65,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,528 | Exceptional $44,911 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,365 | Exceptional $54,800 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,624 | Exceptional $113,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Poor $96,834 | Exceptional $121,444 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $57,919 | Exceptional $71,139 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Tragic 28.0% |
Japanese vs Burmese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 62.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 38.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.48%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 10.1%).
Poverty Metric | Japanese | Burmese |
Poverty | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Tragic 9.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.8% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Single Males | Poor 13.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Fair 21.3% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.3% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Japanese vs Burmese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Japanese | Burmese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Average 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.1% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Good 7.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Japanese vs Burmese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Japanese | Burmese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Japanese vs Burmese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.0%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.4%), and births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (29.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.22, a difference of 4.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Japanese | Burmese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.2% | Exceptional 49.8% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.35 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 35.2% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Japanese vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Japanese | Burmese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.6% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.5% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.8% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Japanese vs Burmese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 73.5%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 73.1%), and no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Japanese | Burmese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.3% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.7% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.7% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.9% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 88.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.2% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.7% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 46.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Japanese vs Burmese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.1%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.9%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.4%).
Disability Metric | Japanese | Burmese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.2% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Average 3.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |