Scottish vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,322,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 40.3 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,101 compared to $103,145, a difference of 21.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $113,701, a difference of 20.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $121,444, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $54,800, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $71,139, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 27.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.2%), poverty (11.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 20.3%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.57%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 43.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.8%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.0% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 46.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 34.3%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.9%).