Ethiopian vs Burmese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Burmese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ethiopians
Burmese
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Burmese Integration in Ethiopian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,322,664 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.441. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.066% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to a decrease of 66.0 Burmese.
Ethiopian vs Burmese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 28.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $113,701, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,736 compared to $121,444, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $54,800, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $44,911, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $71,139, a difference of 9.5%).
Income Metric | Ethiopian | Burmese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,569 | Exceptional $52,005 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,251 | Exceptional $123,369 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,640 | Exceptional $103,145 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,572 | Exceptional $54,559 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,243 | Exceptional $65,236 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,243 | Exceptional $44,911 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,818 | Exceptional $54,800 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,824 | Exceptional $113,701 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,736 | Exceptional $121,444 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,989 | Exceptional $71,139 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 28.0% |
Ethiopian vs Burmese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Poverty Metric | Ethiopian | Burmese |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Exceptional 13.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 12.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 13.0% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 18.3% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 26.2% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Ethiopian vs Burmese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.61%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Ethiopian | Burmese |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Excellent 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Ethiopian vs Burmese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ethiopian | Burmese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.3% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.0% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.2% | Tragic 34.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 73.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Exceptional 85.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Ethiopian vs Burmese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (61.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 7.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Ethiopian | Burmese |
Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Exceptional 65.7% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 49.8% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 26.4% |
Ethiopian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.95%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ethiopian | Burmese |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Ethiopian vs Burmese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.5%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.48%).
Education Level Metric | Ethiopian | Burmese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Excellent 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Excellent 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Excellent 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Excellent 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Good 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Excellent 97.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Excellent 97.3% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Excellent 96.3% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Exceptional 94.5% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 93.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Exceptional 92.6% |
High School Diploma | Fair 89.0% | Exceptional 90.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Exceptional 88.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 71.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Exceptional 66.7% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Exceptional 54.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Exceptional 46.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.0% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Ethiopian vs Burmese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Disability Metric | Ethiopian | Burmese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Exceptional 20.6% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Exceptional 45.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |