Canadian vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,271,032 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of British within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.828. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.111% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 111.1 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $63,940, a difference of 2.8%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and median family income ($106,597 compared to $108,705, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $39,772, a difference of 0.12%), median earnings ($47,911 compared to $48,189, a difference of 0.58%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,625 compared to $98,359, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), single female poverty (21.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.20%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 3.6%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.090%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.79%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 10.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and British communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.29%).