Tlingit-Haida vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Latvian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Latvians
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,624,230 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 12.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 26.5% |
Range | 15.1% | 26.1% |
Mean | 5.6% | 4.8% |
Median | 4.1% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Okinawan (4.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Australia (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |