Tlingit-Haida vs Israeli Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Israeli
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Israelis
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
33.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Israeli Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,624,230 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,909,824 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 21.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Israeli |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 16.3% | 38.6% |
Range | 15.1% | 37.8% |
Mean | 5.6% | 7.9% |
Median | 4.1% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 9.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Okinawan (4.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Australia (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.4 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), South American Indian (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and American (5.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Chile | 38.8 /100 | #181 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 37.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 5.3% |
Peruvians | 37.6 /100 | #183 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 35.8 /100 | #184 | Fair 5.3% |
Americans | 35.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 5.3% |
Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |