Danish vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Danish
Latvian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Danes
Latvians
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 466,536,369 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 4.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 6.3%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Danish | Latvian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 42.0% | 26.5% |
Range | 40.0% | 26.1% |
Mean | 8.1% | 4.8% |
Median | 4.8% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Danes and Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Cypriot (4.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Taiwan (4.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.96%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |