Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Latvian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Latvians
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
72.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,673,890 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 30.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.3% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 15.9% | 26.5% |
Range | 14.6% | 26.1% |
Mean | 5.9% | 4.8% |
Median | 5.0% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Sri Lankan (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Delaware (5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Russia | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 78.6 /100 | #149 | Good 5.0% |
Brazilians | 78.3 /100 | #150 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |