Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
 Latvian
 Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Latvians
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,433,461 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 63.2%.
 
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Latvian | 
| Minimum | 0.88% | 0.39% | 
| Maximum | 81.8% | 26.5% | 
| Range | 80.9% | 26.1% | 
| Mean | 6.9% | 4.8% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 3.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 2.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 5.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 3.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 4.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 3.9% | 
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.25%), West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271  | Tragic 6.2%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272  | Tragic 6.2%  | 
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1  | Exceptional 3.6%  | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2  | Exceptional 3.6%  | 
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3  | Exceptional 3.7%  | 
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 3.8%  | 
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 3.9%  | 
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 3.9%  | 
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 3.9%  | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 3.9%  | 
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 3.9%  | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 3.9%  | 
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 4.0%  | 
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 4.0%  | 
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 4.0%  | 
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 4.0%  | 
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 4.0%  |