South African vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Latvian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Latvians
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Latvian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,779,474 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.933 and weighted average of 4.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,282,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 3.9%, a difference of 17.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Latvian |
Minimum | 1.00% | 0.39% |
Maximum | 35.3% | 26.5% |
Range | 34.3% | 26.1% |
Mean | 6.2% | 4.8% |
Median | 4.4% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from Turkey (4.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (4.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (4.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Croatia (4.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (4.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Scotch-Irish | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Icelanders | 99.0 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Greece | 98.9 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Canadians | 98.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 4.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 4.6% |
South Africans | 98.7 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Bolivians | 98.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.5 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 98.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Basques | 98.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Norway | 98.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.54%), Croatian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and Swedish (3.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |