Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Celtic Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
 Celtic
 Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Celtics
6.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Celtic Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,433,461 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.783 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 33.2%.
 
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Celtic | 
| Minimum | 0.88% | 1.3% | 
| Maximum | 81.8% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 80.9% | 98.7% | 
| Mean | 6.9% | 8.7% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 5.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.4% | 9.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 5.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 12.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 12.1% | 
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Houma (6.4%, a difference of 0.25%), West Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.29%), Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Yaqui (6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and Mexican American Indian (6.4%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271  | Tragic 6.2%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #272  | Tragic 6.2%  | 
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #273  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Barbadians | 0.1 /100 | #274  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.1 /100 | #275  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #276  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #277  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #278  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285  | Tragic 6.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Nepal | 95.9 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 4.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.1 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 4.8%  | 
| Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 4.8%  | 
| Celtics | 94.8 /100 | #116  | Exceptional 4.8%  | 
| Kenyans | 94.7 /100 | #117  | Exceptional 4.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 94.6 /100 | #118  | Exceptional 4.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.0 /100 | #119  | Exceptional 4.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 93.4 /100 | #120  | Exceptional 4.8%  | 
| Indians (Asian) | 93.2 /100 | #121  | Exceptional 4.8%  | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 93.1 /100 | #122  | Exceptional 4.8%  | 
| Jordanians | 93.1 /100 | #123  | Exceptional 4.8%  |