Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Bhutanese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Sierra Leone
Bhutanese
5.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
39.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
180th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sierra Leone vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,444,500 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sierra Leone and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 5.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 29.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sierra Leone | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 0.66% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 12.0% | 49.5% |
Range | 11.4% | 48.9% |
Mean | 5.1% | 5.1% |
Median | 5.1% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sierra Leone are Immigrants from Chile (5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Peruvian (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Spanish (5.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nonimmigrants (5.3%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Alsatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 5.2% |
Marshallese | 47.9 /100 | #175 | Average 5.2% |
Menominee | 47.8 /100 | #176 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 45.1 /100 | #177 | Average 5.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 5.2% |
Spanish | 41.4 /100 | #179 | Average 5.3% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 39.3 /100 | #180 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Chile | 38.8 /100 | #181 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 37.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 5.3% |
Peruvians | 37.6 /100 | #183 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 35.8 /100 | #184 | Fair 5.3% |
Americans | 35.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 5.3% |
Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |