Iroquois vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Iroquois
Bhutanese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Iroquois
Bhutanese
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
13.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
214th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 206,259,155 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 34.4%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 49.5% |
| Range | 21.3% | 48.9% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 5.1% |
| Median | 5.9% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.9% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Liberia (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Nigerian (5.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Africa | 17.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 5.5% |
| French American Indians | 16.1 /100 | #208 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 15.4 /100 | #209 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 5.5% |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
| Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
| Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
| Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
| Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
| Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |