Aleut vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Aleut
Bhutanese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Aleuts
Bhutanese
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
97.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,581,889 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.679 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 14.5%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Aleut | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 50.0% | 49.5% |
Range | 48.4% | 48.9% |
Mean | 10.4% | 5.1% |
Median | 4.8% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 2.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Aleuts by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from Moldova (4.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from France (4.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Germany (4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Romania (4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and Laotian (4.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Native Hawaiians | 98.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Yugoslavians | 97.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Asians | 97.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 96.2 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Pakistanis | 96.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Tongans | 95.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |