Dutch vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Dutch
Bhutanese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Dutch
Bhutanese
4.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 541,561,341 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.085 and weighted average of 4.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 2.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 0.25% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 22.4% | 49.5% |
| Range | 22.2% | 48.9% |
| Mean | 4.1% | 5.1% |
| Median | 3.6% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.5% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch and Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Irish (4.2%, a difference of 0.23%), European (4.2%, a difference of 0.57%), English (4.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Iranian (4.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and Greek (4.2%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Estonians | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Greeks | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Irish | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |