South American vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Bhutanese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Bhutanese
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,269,778 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 37.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South American | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 14.8% | 49.5% |
| Range | 13.6% | 48.9% |
| Mean | 6.2% | 5.1% |
| Median | 5.8% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Americans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Zaire (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (5.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Cambodia (5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Sudanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Subsaharan African (5.7%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
| South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |