Russian vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Russian
Bhutanese
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Russians
Bhutanese
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Bhutanese Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,513,768 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.691 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,291,687 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.217 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 5.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Russian | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 64.7% | 49.5% |
| Range | 63.1% | 48.9% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 5.1% |
| Median | 4.1% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 6.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Russians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Zimbabwean (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Finns | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 4.2% |