Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chilean Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chilean
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Lebanon
Chileans
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Lebanon vs Chilean Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,985,919 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.347 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,415,237 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 1.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Lebanon | Chilean |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 44.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 41.0% | 98.2% |
| Mean | 18.7% | 25.9% |
| Median | 17.2% | 19.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.3% | 25.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 20.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 20.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lebanon and Chileans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lebanon are Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (19.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Afghan (19.5%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Cameroon (19.8%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |