Immigrants from Jordan vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,872,287 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,634,387 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 6.2%, a difference of 21.8%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Jordan	Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Minimum	1.7%	0.75%
Maximum	25.3%	14.6%
Range	23.5%	13.9%
Mean	6.5%	6.3%
Median	4.6%	5.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.7%	4.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.3%	6.8%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.5%	2.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.9%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.9%	3.0%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.53%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%
Argentineans	70.7 /100 \| #157	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	70.4 /100 \| #158	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	70.3 /100 \| #159	Good 5.1%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.5 /100 \| #160	Good 5.1%
Ethiopians	68.1 /100 \| #161	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	66.5 /100 \| #162	Good 5.1%
Sierra Leoneans	64.1 /100 \| #163	Good 5.1%
Hawaiians	62.3 /100 \| #164	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	62.2 /100 \| #165	Good 5.1%
Paraguayans	61.5 /100 \| #166	Good 5.1%
Costa Ricans	61.5 /100 \| #167	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	54.9 /100 \| #168	Average 5.2%
Ottawa	54.5 /100 \| #169	Average 5.2%

Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Bahamas (6.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jamaica (6.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from West Indies (6.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Alaska Native (6.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and Colville (6.3%, a difference of 0.78%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Blackfeet	0.2 /100 \| #265	Tragic 6.2%
Creek	0.2 /100 \| #266	Tragic 6.2%
Spanish Americans	0.2 /100 \| #267	Tragic 6.2%
Alaska Natives	0.2 /100 \| #268	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| West Indies	0.1 /100 \| #269	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| Jamaica	0.1 /100 \| #270	Tragic 6.2%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.1 /100 \| #271	Tragic 6.2%
Trinidadians and Tobagonians	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 6.2%
Colville	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 6.3%
Barbadians	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 6.3%
Choctaw	0.1 /100 \| #275	Tragic 6.3%
Yaqui	0.1 /100 \| #276	Tragic 6.3%
Indonesians	0.1 /100 \| #277	Tragic 6.3%
Immigrants \| Trinidad and Tobago	0.1 /100 \| #278	Tragic 6.4%
Houma	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 6.4%