Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from North America Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Jamaica
Immigrants from North America
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Jamaica
Immigrants from North America
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
30.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
192nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Jamaica vs Immigrants from North America Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,568,365 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077 and weighted average of 21.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,673,972 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 4.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Jamaica | Immigrants from North America |
Minimum | 4.4% | 17.0% |
Maximum | 59.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 54.9% | 83.0% |
Mean | 20.4% | 49.1% |
Median | 20.8% | 41.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 22.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.1% | 70.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 47.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 28.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.2% | 28.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jamaica by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jamaica are Immigrants from Germany (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from North America by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from North America are Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Slovene (20.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |