Comanche vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Scottish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Scottish
6.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,532,955 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,662,179 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 40.1%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Scottish |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 46.6% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 18.6% |
| Median | 6.0% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.5% | 22.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Somalia (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), African (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Bangladeshi (6.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Northern European (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (4.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Swiss (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |