Turkish vs Immigrants from Armenia Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Armenia
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Armenia
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
36th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Armenia Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,182,441 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,216,113 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 0.020%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Armenia |
Minimum | 1.7% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 67.9% | 48.3% |
Range | 66.2% | 45.0% |
Mean | 20.0% | 18.8% |
Median | 16.6% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.5% | 12.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.6% | 23.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.8% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.6% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Immigrants from Armenia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Asia (18.6%, a difference of 0.57%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Asia (18.6%, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |