Canadian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Chickasaw
13.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 379,144,992 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 22.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 12.8% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 87.2% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 41.0% | 25.6% |
| Median | 26.2% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.3% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 50.1% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.2% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.5% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are British (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Luxembourger (13.4%, a difference of 0.15%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |