Canadian vs Luxembourger Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Luxembourger
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Luxembourgers
13.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
4.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Luxembourger Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 379,144,992 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,228,824 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.15%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Canadian | Luxembourger |
Minimum | 12.8% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 48.3% |
Range | 87.2% | 44.3% |
Mean | 41.0% | 22.6% |
Median | 26.2% | 20.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.1% | 12.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.3% | 33.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 50.1% | 21.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 30.2% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 29.5% | 12.1% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians and Luxembourgers by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are British (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.10%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Caribbean (13.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Czechoslovakian (13.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 8.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.2% |
Jamaicans | 7.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.2% |
Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 1.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 13.5% |