Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Chickasaw
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,367,867 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 95.5% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 32.3% | 25.6% |
| Median | 29.1% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.3% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.3% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.8% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians and Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Alaskan Athabascan (16.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.34%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.48%), and Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.71%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |