Yakama vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Chickasaw
15.9%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,068,599 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 2.4%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yakama | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 5.7% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 52.4% | 67.9% |
| Range | 46.7% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 20.7% | 25.6% |
| Median | 21.2% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.0% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.9% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.54%), Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.54%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.77%), American (15.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and Potawatomi (15.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |