Canadian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Chickasaw
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Chickasaw
8.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Chickasaw Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 435,772,566 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.712 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,601,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 32.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 3.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 33.3% |
| Range | 97.7% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 12.7% |
| Median | 10.9% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.7% | 14.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.7% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.4% | 5.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (8.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from France (8.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Taiwanese (8.2%, a difference of 0.28%), Romanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and Jordanian (8.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | France | 94.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Canadians | 94.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 93.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| South Africans | 93.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 93.2 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| French | 92.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 91.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Subsaharan African (10.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |