Pakistani vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Pakistani
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Pakistanis
Chickasaw
12.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pakistani vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,084,454 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.689 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 31.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pakistani | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 97.9% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 26.1% | 25.6% |
| Median | 17.0% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.3% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.0% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.2% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Nicaraguan (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Kenyan (12.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Syria (12.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Oceania (12.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 95.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iraqis | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Ugandans | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 93.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Kenyans | 93.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Pakistanis | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Nicaraguans | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Venezuelans | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |