Canadian vs Chickasaw 2 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Canadian
Chickasaw
2 or more Vehicles in Household
2 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Canadians
Chickasaw
58.6%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
59.0%
2 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
56th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Chickasaw 2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,314,459 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.288 and weighted average of 58.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,673,541 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with 2 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.339 and weighted average of 59.0%, a difference of 0.72%.
2 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 21.4% | 28.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 84.2% |
| Range | 78.6% | 56.0% |
| Mean | 62.2% | 61.9% |
| Median | 63.0% | 63.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.5% | 56.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.6% | 68.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.3% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians and Chickasaw by 2 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 2 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Laotian (58.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Croatian (58.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Central America (58.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (58.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Pennsylvania German (58.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Afghan (59.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Luxembourger (59.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (59.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Scotland (58.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Spanish American (58.9%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 2 or more Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 59.2% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 59.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 59.1% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 59.1% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 59.0% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 59.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 58.9% |
| Spanish Americans | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 58.9% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 58.9% |
| Osage | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 58.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 58.8% |
| Mexican American Indians | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 58.7% |
| Portuguese | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 58.6% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 58.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 58.6% |
| Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 58.6% |
| Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 58.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 58.5% |
| Italians | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 58.4% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 58.4% |
| Austrians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 58.4% |