West Indian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
West Indian
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
West Indians
Chickasaw
13.8%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 236,137,868 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 17.8%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | West Indian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.3% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
Range | 95.7% | 63.9% |
Mean | 17.4% | 25.6% |
Median | 13.9% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.6% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.4% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.2% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to West Indians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Immigrants from Congo (13.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Cape Verdean (13.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Fijian (13.8%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (13.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and Hungarian (13.8%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.3 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.8% |
Swiss | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.8% |
Hungarians | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.8% |
Fijians | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.8% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.8% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.9% |
Germans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.9% |
Scottish | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.0% |
Irish | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |