Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Syria
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Syria
Chickasaw
12.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Syria vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,303,345 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Syria and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 12.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 31.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Syria | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.3% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 34.8% | 67.9% |
Range | 31.5% | 63.9% |
Mean | 13.4% | 25.6% |
Median | 12.1% | 23.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.9% | 16.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.7% | 31.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 14.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Syria by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Syria are Immigrants from Oceania (12.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (12.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Albanian (12.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Albania (12.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Nicaraguan (12.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Ugandans | 94.5 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 93.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Kenyans | 93.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Pakistanis | 92.4 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Nicaraguans | 92.1 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 91.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 90.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Venezuelans | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 12.4% |
Icelanders | 88.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 12.5% |
Serbians | 87.9 /100 | #122 | Excellent 12.5% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 87.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |