Lebanese vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Lebanese
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Lebanese
Chickasaw
13.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
6.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
228th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 352,480,661 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 23.2%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lebanese | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 67.9% | 67.9% |
| Range | 63.6% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 20.5% | 25.6% |
| Median | 15.0% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.4% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.3% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lebanese by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Haitian (13.2%, a difference of 0.080%), European (13.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Ghanaian (13.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Jamaican (13.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Slavic (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 10.7 /100 | #221 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 10.0 /100 | #222 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 9.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Somalis | 9.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 8.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 7.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |