Immigrants from Italy vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Italy
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Italy
Chickasaw
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Italy vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,137,274 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 33.9%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Italy | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.4% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 95.6% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 19.9% | 25.6% |
| Median | 12.4% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.6% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Italy by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 96.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 96.7 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |