Ecuadorian Family Households
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Select to Compare
Family Households
Ecuadorian Family Households
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
95.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,646,947 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471 and weighted average of 65.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.37% in percentage of family households.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Ecuadorians and percentage of family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Ecuadorians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of family households within an area, or if Ecuadorians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Iraq (65.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Cherokee (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Argentinean (65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Spanish (65.0%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Immigrants from Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants from Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants from Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants from Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
Ecuadorian Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian Data | Family Households Data |
| Minimum | 0.10% | 47.6% |
| Maximum | 59.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 59.3% | 52.4% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 67.4% |
| Median | 9.1% | 67.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 63.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 71.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.0% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 7.8% |
Correlation Details
| Ecuadorian Percentile | Sample Size | Family Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.10% | 225,873,265 | 63.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 35,405,715 | 65.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.74% | 18,221,574 | 65.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 7,912,309 | 67.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 4,837,413 | 66.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 3,845,305 | 65.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.93% | 1,923,175 | 64.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 10,138,643 | 60.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.49% | 1,884,784 | 67.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.82% | 1,070,403 | 67.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.16% | 1,010,740 | 65.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.39% | 701,516 | 66.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.68% | 275,994 | 65.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.04% | 209,404 | 69.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.28% | 370,549 | 63.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.62% | 297,502 | 65.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.94% | 76,880 | 59.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.12% | 295,399 | 62.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 98,704 | 73.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.79% | 75,504 | 71.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 159,101 | 72.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.41% | 105,683 | 75.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.71% | 199,062 | 68.0% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.97% | 101,959 | 71.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.25% | 222,817 | 68.7% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.52% | 182,213 | 62.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.83% | 150,353 | 68.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.12% | 107,043 | 56.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 156,526 | 62.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 334,815 | 60.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.07% | 31,554 | 79.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 12,343 | 54.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 51,505 | 72.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.96% | 227,148 | 68.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.20% | 32,963 | 74.1% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.58% | 91,516 | 52.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 86,963 | 65.1% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 22,800 | 67.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.65% | 127,356 | 70.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.90% | 112,396 | 66.0% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.37% | 100,539 | 64.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.11% | 9,606 | 69.1% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.78% | 112,299 | 61.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.12% | 70,524 | 68.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.65% | 42,547 | 63.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.89% | 27,708 | 67.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.59% | 9,126 | 80.7% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.43% | 11,777 | 69.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.72% | 1,078 | 77.9% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.55% | 275 | 48.1% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.11% | 21,040 | 67.1% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.04% | 1,231 | 47.6% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.25% | 5,946 | 74.6% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.68% | 5,587 | 65.0% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.08% | 1,005 | 63.0% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.90% | 112,750 | 76.6% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.24% | 56,696 | 69.7% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.90% | 9,162 | 70.8% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.59% | 4,407 | 74.6% |
[ 35.5% - 36.0% ] 35.76% | 2,718 | 79.7% |
[ 59.0% - 59.5% ] 59.38% | 32 | 100.0% |