African vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
African
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Africans
Chickasaw
41.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 470,023,481 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 41.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 11.4%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | African | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 84.5% | 68.4% |
| Range | 82.7% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 37.6% | 48.9% |
| Median | 38.9% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 31.7% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 41.2% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.9% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Africans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Guyana (41.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (41.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Liberia (41.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Bahamas (41.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Somalis | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 41.4% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 41.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |