African vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
African
Chickasaw
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Africans
Chickasaw
12.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Chickasaw No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,587,703 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,505,491 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 56.8%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | African | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 37.8% | 15.9% |
Range | 35.4% | 14.6% |
Mean | 13.9% | 6.1% |
Median | 12.3% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.3% | 7.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 3.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 3.0% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Switzerland (12.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Egypt (12.2%, a difference of 0.71%), Immigrants from Liberia (12.2%, a difference of 0.86%), Subsaharan African (12.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and Israeli (12.4%, a difference of 0.96%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.6 /100 | #262 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 0.6 /100 | #263 | Tragic 12.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.5 /100 | #264 | Tragic 12.3% |
Africans | 0.4 /100 | #265 | Tragic 12.3% |
Israelis | 0.3 /100 | #266 | Tragic 12.4% |
Immigrants | Europe | 0.3 /100 | #267 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 12.5% |
Panamanians | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 12.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.2 /100 | #271 | Tragic 12.6% |
Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.36%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |