Indonesian vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Indonesian
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Indonesians
Chickasaw
43.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Indonesian vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,724,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.197 and weighted average of 43.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 7.2%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Indonesian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 28.3% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 64.1% | 68.4% |
| Range | 35.8% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 45.0% | 48.9% |
| Median | 44.3% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.9% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.4% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Indonesians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Bermudan (43.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Yaqui (43.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Salvadoran (43.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Nigerian (43.4%, a difference of 0.060%), and Colville (43.4%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |