Welsh vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Welsh
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Welsh
Chickasaw
48.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
28th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Welsh vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,516,985 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.459 and weighted average of 48.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 5.0%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Welsh | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 18.4% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 68.4% |
| Range | 81.6% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 59.7% | 48.9% |
| Median | 55.4% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 49.6% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.0% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.4% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.8% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Welsh by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Burmese (48.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Croatian (48.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Eastern European (48.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Polish (48.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (48.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.1% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Maltese | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.0% |
| Burmese | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Welsh | 99.5 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Croatians | 99.5 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Irish | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 48.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |