Hopi vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Hopi
 Chickasaw
 Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Hopi
Chickasaw
36.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hopi vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,739,770 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Hopi and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.486 and weighted average of 36.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 27.5%.
 
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hopi | Chickasaw | 
| Minimum | 2.1% | 27.5% | 
| Maximum | 64.0% | 68.4% | 
| Range | 61.9% | 40.9% | 
| Mean | 32.7% | 48.9% | 
| Median | 32.0% | 49.7% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 45.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.6% | 54.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.9% | 9.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 7.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 7.4% | 
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Hopi by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Tohono O'odham (36.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Pima (35.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (37.8%, a difference of 3.5%), Pueblo (38.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (38.9%, a difference of 6.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 39.9%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 39.9%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 39.8%  | 
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 39.8%  | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 39.6%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 39.6%  | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 39.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 39.1%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 39.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 38.9%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 38.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 37.8%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 36.8%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 36.5%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 35.9%  | 
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171  | Average 46.7%  | 
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172  | Average 46.7%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173  | Average 46.7%  | 
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178  | Average 46.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179  | Average 46.5%  | 
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180  | Average 46.5%  | 
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181  | Average 46.5%  | 
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182  | Average 46.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183  | Fair 46.5%  | 
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184  | Fair 46.4%  | 
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185  | Fair 46.4%  |