Central American vs Chickasaw Currently Married
COMPARE
Central American
Chickasaw
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Central Americans
Chickasaw
43.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
278th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
47.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
178th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs Chickasaw Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,519,011 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.430 and weighted average of 43.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,723,431 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.194 and weighted average of 46.6%, a difference of 7.5%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 24.4% | 27.5% |
| Maximum | 57.2% | 68.4% |
| Range | 32.8% | 40.9% |
| Mean | 40.8% | 48.9% |
| Median | 41.6% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.1% | 54.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 7.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Central Americans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Central American Indian (43.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Nigeria (43.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Sierra Leonean (43.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Colville (43.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and Apache (43.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Bermudans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Indonesians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Yaqui | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Colville | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |